Real high-cavity PET preform mold used for cavity capacity comparison

Cavity selection center

PET Preform Mold Cavity Options

Work backward from required output and a verified cycle before choosing 24, 32, 48, 64, 72 or 96 cavities.

Preform weight defines part mass per cycle. Verified trial or production data establishes the cycle basis. The final choice also matches the exact injection machine, mold envelope, runner, cooling, controls and operating plan.

Capacity calculation

Compare every published cavity option from the same production basis

Enter the approved preform weight and required running output. Add a verified cycle only when it comes from a comparable preform, machine and cooling condition.

Cavity feasibility

Required cycle for each cavity option

Enter preform weight and required line output. The tool works backward to show the required cycle for each standard cavity count, then uses an entered trial or production cycle to recommend a cavity option.

Formula: maximum cycle = cavities x 3,600 / required hourly output. Enter the cycle established for the project preform, wall section, resin, machine and cooling conditions.

Cavity comparison

Enter weight and output

The result will show the cycle ceiling and part mass for 24, 32, 48, 64, 72 and 96 cavities. A specific recommendation appears only when a verified cycle is entered.

243248647296

The comparison uses preform weight for part mass and a verified cycle for output selection. Wall thickness, geometry, PET resin, cooling water, hot runner, machine performance and quality requirements complete the engineering review.

Published cavity range

Open the exact page only after the option survives the first calculation

Every card shows the capacity relationship for one project basis. Compare the same preform, verified cycle, utilization and operating calendar to identify the best-supported option.

24

Cavities

Controlled entry option

Baseline among the published options

Use when 24 cavities meet confirmed output with operating and maintenance margin.

Review 24-Cavity

32

Cavities

Intermediate capacity step

33.3% more parts per cycle than 24

Use when 32 meets the output plan more efficiently than moving directly from 24 to 48 cavities.

Review 32-Cavity

48

Cavities

Established production step

50% more parts per cycle than 32

Use when demand is established and the machine, runner and maintenance plan support 48 drops.

Review 48-Cavity

64

Cavities

Higher-output system

33.3% more parts per cycle than 48

Use when 48 is commercially short and the larger mold, controls and utilities are justified.

Review 64-Cavity

72

Cavities

High-capacity system

12.5% more parts per cycle than 64

Use when the extra eight cavities have a measured capacity benefit and the full system is ready.

Review 72-Cavity

96

Cavities

Maximum single-mold output

33.3% more parts per cycle than 72

Use for sustained high-volume programs supported by a coordinated machine, runner, cooling and maintenance platform.

Review 96-Cavity

System qualification

Turn the cavity result into a complete machine-fit plan

The calculator identifies the capacity direction. The machine review then matches mold fit, recovery, cooling, opening and operation to the proposed production system.

Approved preform drawing, weight, resin and neck

Total part shot and injection-unit operating window

Plasticizing and recovery at the verified cycle

Tie bars, platen, mold height, opening and take-out

Hot-runner zones, connectors, voltage and actuation

Cooling-water conditions, circuits and plant utilities

Maintenance access, critical spares and technician capability

All-cavity trial, traceable samples and acceptance responsibility

Operating value

Buy the cavity count that creates a measurable production benefit

01

Match capacity to demand

Select a high-cavity mold when forecast demand and operating hours use its capital and maintenance resources productively.

02

Using an optimistic cycle

A cavity calculation can look attractive when cooling, resin, machine and real operating losses are omitted.

03

Ignoring cavity-level acceptance

Higher counts require an agreed method for identifying samples and reviewing consistency across the cavity set.

Cavity comparison RFQ

Send the inputs needed to turn the calculation into a supported mold direction

Send output and machine information even when the cavity count is open. The response can compare neighboring options instead of forcing one number too early.

Preform drawing, resin and weight
Required annual and hourly output
Planned operating hours and changeovers
Existing injection machine specification
Preferred cavity range if any
Maintenance and spare-parts expectations
Future capacity-growth plan

Quick Inquiry

Send mold requirement

Project RFQ

Required: name, country, message, and email or WhatsApp. Technical fields are optional but improve quotation speed.

Optional technical fields

Buyer questions

PET preform mold cavity FAQ

How is PET preform mold cavity count calculated from target output?+

Use the required saleable output, operating hours, expected utilization and a stated project cycle assumption. Then check whether the resulting cavity range fits the part, machine, cooling, controls and maintenance plan.

Should I always compare the next higher cavity option?+

Yes when the machine and business case allow it, but compare total project burden as well as capacity. The next higher option may require a different machine, controller, utility or spare-parts plan.

How does the injection machine shape the cavity selection?+

The shortlist begins from output, then total shot, mold envelope, mold height, controls, cooling, utilities and take-out on the exact machine finalize the cavity selection.

How does preform weight change the cavity recommendation?+

Weight and geometry change total shot, cooling and machine demand, so lightweight water, heavy and wide-mouth preforms receive their own cavity calculation.

WhatsAppRFQ